The person stays in control
A proposed backup becomes a plan only when the older person accepts it and a trusted facilitator has checked it.
👤 The person chooses
Which outing matters most? Is the help welcome? Proceed, decline, or decide later, always voluntary.
🤝 A facilitator verifies
Someone checks the open items: Has the neighbour agreed? Is there a hearing loop? Their name, role and date are recorded.
🧾 The tool keeps evidence
Every decision goes into a tamper-evident log, including a reason when an option is rejected.
Right now, in this demo
Introduce / involve: Volunteer ride service
If Daughter (drives) is unavailable, outings that depend on them are at risk (reference 49 -> 36 with verified options only).
Blocked until every open item is checked. 2 open item(s).
Introduce / involve: Neighbour Pekka (attends same group)
If Daughter (drives) is unavailable, outings that depend on them are at risk (reference 49 -> 36 with verified options only).
Blocked until every open item is checked. 2 open item(s).
The buttons are disabled on purpose: approval is blocked while any item is unknown.
The evidence behind the numbers
16 verified 11 reported by the person 7 unknown 1 failed
Every number carries its source: reported by the person, verified by a checker, or assumed. Open the full ledger and audit log.
Invented person. Numbers are computed by the TIEFORGE research model from invented inputs; nothing here is a real participant or a clinical result.